In most car accident cases, your settlement is capped by the at-fault driver’s insurance policy limits, since insurers are not required to pay out more than the coverage the driver purchased. Still, when your medical bills, lost wages, and other losses exceed those limits, you are not simply out of options. California law and your own insurance policy may offer several paths to recover the difference, including pursuing the at-fault driver directly, tapping into additional coverage, or holding other responsible parties accountable for the harm.
At Younglove Law Group, our Newport Beach personal injury attorneys work with clients across California whose damages outpace what an at-fault driver’s insurer is willing to pay. Below, we walk through how policy limits work, what changed under California’s new minimum coverage law, and the practical options that may help you recover more than the initial policy limit allows.
How Insurance Policy Limits Work in a California Car Accident Claim
Every driver in California is required to carry insurance that meets the state’s financial responsibility law, since driving without proof of coverage is illegal. That coverage typically falls into two categories, each with its own dollar limits set by the policy the driver purchased:
- Bodily injury liability coverage, which pays for injuries to people harmed in the crash, subject to a per-person and a per-accident limit.
- Property damage liability coverage, which pays to repair or replace a vehicle or other property damaged in the collision, subject to a separate limit.
Because these limits apply separately, a driver’s policy generally will not pay out more than what was purchased, regardless of how severe your injuries are or how high your medical bills climb. Policies are also written as either split limits, with a separate per-person and per-accident cap, or as a single combined limit that applies to all injuries and property damage from one crash. When more than one person is hurt in the same accident, the per-accident limit is divided among everyone with a claim, which can shrink your individual recovery even further if you were riding with passengers or the collision involved several vehicles. Some policies also include optional medical payment coverage, which can help pay initial medical bills regardless of fault. Our guide to MedPay coverage in California explains how that coverage works alongside standard liability insurance. Understanding your case value early, and comparing it against the at-fault driver’s available coverage, matters just as much as understanding who was at fault.
California Raised Its Minimum Insurance Requirements in 2025
For decades, California required drivers to carry only $15,000 in bodily injury coverage per person and $30,000 per accident, limits that had not changed since 1967. Under California’s new minimum insurance law, Senate Bill 1107, the state’s minimum liability requirements increased to $30,000 per person, $60,000 per accident, and $15,000 for property damage, becoming operative on January 1, 2025.
This change means drivers renewing their policies after that date generally carry higher minimum limits than in prior years, though many policies purchased before the update may still be operating under the old limits until their next renewal. The prior $15,000 per-person minimum could be exhausted by a single emergency room visit or a short hospital stay, which is part of why claims involving the old minimum limits so often left injured drivers with unpaid bills. Even with higher minimums in place, catastrophic injury cases, especially those involving surgery, long-term care, or lost earning capacity, can still exceed what a minimum policy provides. Finding out early whether the at-fault driver carries only the state minimum or a higher limit is one of the most useful steps in evaluating your claim.
Can Your Settlement Exceed the At-Fault Driver’s Policy Limits?
Settlements that exceed an at-fault driver’s insurance policy limits are not the norm, since insurers are only contractually obligated to pay up to the coverage purchased. However, when injuries are severe or long-lasting, medical costs and lost income can outpace even a mid-range policy relatively quickly. Extended hospitalization, surgery, ongoing physical therapy, future medical needs, and a reduced capacity to earn a living all add up in ways that a policy purchased years earlier may never have anticipated. When this happens, several legal and insurance-based options may be available to help close the gap between what the insurer will pay and what your claim may actually be worth. Discussing these options with a personal injury lawyer early can help you understand which ones apply to your circumstances.
Suing the At-Fault Driver for the Difference
One option is to pursue the at-fault driver personally for the amount that exceeds their policy limit. This route can be worthwhile when the driver has significant personal assets, such as real estate, savings, or other property, that could be used to satisfy a judgment. In many cases, however, individual drivers do not have enough personal assets to make this approach practical, and pursuing a judgment against someone with limited resources can take considerable time without resulting in actual payment. Even after a court issues a judgment, collecting on it can require additional steps, such as placing a lien on real property or garnishing wages, and a driver with few assets may be able to discharge the debt in bankruptcy before you ever collect. Weighing the likely cost and duration of litigation against the realistic chance of collecting anything beyond the insurance payout is an important part of this decision.
Pursuing Multiple At-Fault Parties
If more than one party contributed to the accident, you may be able to hold each of them accountable for their share of the damages. This can include another driver, a commercial vehicle operator, or an employer if the at-fault driver was working at the time of the crash. A vehicle defect, a hazardous road condition maintained by a public entity, or a third driver who contributed to a chain-reaction collision can also expand the pool of potentially responsible parties. When multiple parties and their respective insurance policies are involved, your recoverable compensation is generally drawn proportionally from each policy based on the degree of fault assigned to that party, which can meaningfully increase the total amount available to cover your losses.
Economic Damages and California’s Proposition 51
California’s Proposition 51 limits each defendant’s liability for non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering, to their proportionate share of fault. Economic damages, including medical expenses and lost wages, work differently. Under Proposition 51, a defendant can still be held responsible for the full amount of a plaintiff’s economic damages in cases where other at-fault parties are unable to pay their share. This means identifying even a partially at-fault defendant who has the means to pay, such as a company or a well-insured party, can meaningfully affect how much of your economic losses are ultimately recoverable, particularly in cases involving an uninsured or judgment-proof defendant.
When an Insurer Acts in Bad Faith
Insurance companies owe their policyholders a duty to handle claims honestly and in a timely manner. When an insurer unreasonably denies a valid claim, delays payment without justification, drags out an investigation with no reasonable basis, or refuses a settlement demand that clearly falls within the at-fault driver’s policy limit, this may be considered acting in bad faith. Some bad faith cases arise when an insurer had the opportunity to settle a claim within the policy limit but failed to do so, exposing the driver to a larger judgment that the insurer could otherwise have avoided. If you can show that an insurer engaged in these practices while handling the at-fault driver’s claim, this may open an additional avenue for recovery beyond the original policy limit. Because bad faith claims often involve fact-specific evidence about how an insurer handled the file, working with an attorney familiar with these tactics can help you recognize the warning signs early.
Umbrella Policies for Additional Coverage
Some drivers carry an umbrella insurance policy in addition to their standard auto coverage. An umbrella policy provides an extra layer of liability protection once the underlying auto policy’s limits have been exhausted, and while these policies are more common among business owners, individuals can purchase them as well, often at a relatively modest additional premium given the extra protection they provide. If the at-fault driver in your case has umbrella coverage, it may provide additional funds beyond what their standard auto policy alone would pay, though identifying this coverage often requires formal discovery during a claim or lawsuit, since umbrella policies are rarely disclosed voluntarily during early settlement talks.
Underinsured and Uninsured Motorist Coverage Can Help Fill the Gap
One of the most overlooked resources for accident victims is their own auto insurance policy. California does not require drivers to carry underinsured motorist (UIM) or uninsured motorist (UM) coverage on its own, but under California Insurance Code section 11580.2, insurers must offer this coverage in an amount matching a policyholder’s bodily injury liability limits, unless the policyholder agrees in writing to reduce or reject it. Many drivers unknowingly carry only a reduced amount of UM/UIM coverage because a lower limit was selected, sometimes years earlier, without much thought given to how it would apply after a serious crash. UIM coverage applies when the at-fault driver’s policy limits are lower than your damages, allowing you to recover the difference, up to your own policy’s UIM limit, from your own insurer. UM coverage serves a similar purpose when the at-fault driver has no insurance at all.
Reviewing the declarations page of your own policy, or asking your insurance agent directly, can reveal whether this coverage is available to you and how much of a gap it might close. It is also worth understanding Proposition 213 before assuming your own coverage will apply the same way it would in a typical claim, since California law places some restrictions on recovery for uninsured drivers involved in an accident. For a closer look at how this coverage works in practice, see our overview of uninsured motorist accidents in California.
What to Do if Your Damages Exceed Available Insurance Coverage
If your losses are climbing toward, or beyond, the at-fault driver’s policy limit, a few practical steps can help protect your claim. First, avoid accepting a quick settlement offer before you understand the full extent of your medical treatment and other losses, since accepting a policy-limit payout typically requires you to release the driver from further liability. Second, request a copy of the declarations page for both the at-fault driver’s policy and your own, so you know exactly what coverage exists on each side. Third, keep detailed records of every medical bill, wage loss, and out-of-pocket expense, since these records support both the initial claim and any later effort to recover additional compensation. Finally, avoid discussing the details of your injuries or the accident with the at-fault driver’s insurance adjuster before you understand how these options may apply, since early recorded statements are sometimes used later to minimize a claim’s value.
If the at-fault driver was uninsured or underinsured, our Newport Beach underinsured and uninsured motorist accident attorneys can help you evaluate your own policy’s coverage and pursue what may be available to you. Acting promptly also matters, since California generally allows a limited window from the date of the accident to file a personal injury lawsuit, and gathering evidence becomes more difficult the longer you wait.
How an Attorney Can Help When Insurance Coverage Falls Short
When the available insurance does not match the scope of your injuries, an attorney’s role often shifts from simply pursuing a straightforward settlement to investigating every possible source of recovery. This can include obtaining the at-fault driver’s full policy declarations, identifying any additional defendants or coverage sources, and building a demand package that documents the true extent of your medical treatment, lost income, and anticipated future care. An attorney can also help coordinate outstanding medical bills, including liens from health insurers or medical providers, so that a settlement or judgment is not immediately absorbed by unresolved billing before you see any of it.
Because these cases often involve more moving parts than a claim that settles comfortably within policy limits, having someone track deadlines, coverage sources, and competing liens can make a meaningful difference in what you ultimately keep from any recovery. This is also where prior experience with insurers matters. Attorneys who have handled cases involving multiple policies, disputed coverage, or a driver’s personal assets tend to recognize patterns in how these claims unfold, which can help set realistic expectations from the outset rather than after months of negotiation.
Frequently Asked Questions About Car Accident Settlements That Exceed Policy Limits
How Often Do Car Accident Settlements Exceed the At-Fault Driver’s Insurance Policy Limits?
It is relatively uncommon for a settlement to exceed the at-fault driver’s policy limits, since insurance companies are only obligated to pay up to the coverage the driver purchased. However, cases involving severe injuries, extensive medical treatment, or long-term disability can produce damages that outpace even a substantial policy, which is when other legal and insurance options become important to explore. An attorney can review the specific facts of your accident to help you understand where your claim is likely to fall.
How Much Car Insurance Are Drivers Required to Carry in California?
As of January 1, 2025, California requires drivers to carry at least $30,000 in bodily injury liability coverage per person, $60,000 per accident, and $15,000 in property damage coverage, an increase from the limits that had been in place since 1967. Some drivers carry higher limits, or additional coverage such as an umbrella policy, beyond these state minimums. Policies that renewed before that date may still reflect the older, lower limits until their next renewal period.
Can I Sue the At-Fault Driver Personally for Damages Beyond Their Policy Limit?
Yes, it is possible to file a lawsuit against an at-fault driver personally for the amount that exceeds their insurance coverage. Whether this is worthwhile often depends on whether the driver has personal assets, such as property or savings, that could realistically satisfy a judgment, since pursuing a driver with limited resources may not result in actual payment. An attorney can help you weigh the likely cost of litigation against the realistic chance of recovering additional funds.
What Does It Mean if an Insurance Company Acts in Bad Faith?
Bad faith generally refers to situations where an insurance company unreasonably denies a valid claim, delays payment without justification, or fails to properly investigate an accident. It can also include an insurer’s failure to accept a reasonable settlement demand that falls within the policy limit. If bad faith practices affected how your claim was handled, this may create an additional avenue for recovery beyond what the original policy limit would otherwise provide.
Does Hiring a Personal Injury Lawyer Cost Anything Upfront if My Claim May Exceed Policy Limits?
Many personal injury attorneys handle car accident cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning fees are generally taken as a percentage of what is recovered rather than paid upfront. This structure is often used regardless of whether the claim settles within the at-fault driver’s policy limit or requires additional steps to pursue further compensation. It is worth confirming the fee arrangement directly with any attorney you consult, including ours, before moving forward with a case.
Can My Own Insurance Policy Help if the At-Fault Driver’s Coverage Is Not Enough?
If you carry underinsured motorist coverage, your own insurer may pay the difference between your damages and the at-fault driver’s policy limit, up to your own policy’s limit. This coverage is separate from the at-fault driver’s insurance, and pursuing it does not require proving that the other driver acted in bad faith or has personal assets. Reviewing your policy’s declarations page, or asking your insurance agent, is the fastest way to find out whether this coverage applies to your situation.
Contact a California Car Accident Attorney at Younglove Law Group
Our attorneys at Younglove Law Group have represented California car accident victims in claims involving disputed liability, multiple at-fault parties, and situations where the available insurance coverage did not match the severity of the injuries involved. We look at every angle of a claim, from the at-fault driver’s policy to your own coverage and any other parties who may share responsibility, before recommending a path forward. Every case is different, and the options that make sense for one client, whether that means pursuing an at-fault driver personally, investigating a bad faith claim, or turning to underinsured motorist coverage, may not be the right fit for another, which is why we take the time to walk through your specific situation before recommending next steps.
If your car accident claim may exceed the at-fault driver’s insurance policy limits, understanding your full range of options, from pursuing the responsible party to tapping into your own underinsured motorist coverage, can make a meaningful difference in your recovery. Reach out to our team through our contact form to discuss the details of your accident and find out which of these paths may apply to your case.